Pediatric Radial Head and Neck Fractures

MD Oguzhan BULUT· Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
Apr 20, 2026

1. Definition & Key Points

  • Fractures of the proximal radius in skeletally immature patients, most often involving the radial neck (metaphysis) rather than the articular surface.

  • Considered pediatric elbow trauma; majority are extra-articular, with true intra-articular radial head fractures being rare before physeal closure.

  • Management choice (nonoperative vs operative) is primarily based on angulation, translation, rotation, patient age, and associated injuries.

2. Epidemiology

  • Account for 5–10% of all pediatric elbow fractures and about 1% of all pediatric fractures.

  • Peak age: 9–10 years; no consistent sex predominance.

  • In many series, radial neck fractures constitute the majority of proximal radius injuries in children.

3. Relevant Anatomy & Biomechanics

·       Elbow ossification centers (CRITOE): Capitellum, Radius, Internal (medial epicondyle), Trochlea, Olecranon, External (lateral epicondyle).

·       Radial head ossification:

o   Appears around 3–5 years, may be bipartite.

o   Fuses with radial shaft at 16–18 years.

·       Annular ligament:

o   Continuation of joint capsule, drapes over epiphysis and physis.

o   Protects physis but creates a stress riser at the metaphysis, so fractures preferentially occur at the neck.

·       Blood supply: largely from the metaphysis → aggressive dissection & open reduction risk osteonecrosis.

4. Mechanism & Associated Injuries

  • Mechanism:

    • Extension + valgus load on an outstretched elbow is classic.

    • Less commonly associated with elbow dislocation or Monteggia variants.

  • Associated injuries (must be actively excluded):

    • Elbow dislocation.

    • Olecranon fracture.

    • Medial epicondyle fracture.

    • Forearm compartment syndrome (rare but serious).

5. Clinical Presentation

  • Symptoms:

    • Lateral elbow pain and tenderness over radial head/neck.

    • Refusal to move the elbow; pain with forearm rotation (pronation–supination) is very typical.

  • Physical exam:

    • Lateral swelling, sometimes minimal deformity.

    • Pain increased by passive rotation; flexion/extension may be less painful.

    • Neurovascular exam: specifically assess radial, median, ulnar nerves; check compartments (especially if high-energy trauma).

6. Imaging

  • Standard radiographs:

    • AP and lateral of the elbow.

    • Assess:

      • Radiocapitellar line: line along radial shaft axis should intersect capitellum on all views (not fully reliable in very young children).

      • Lateral humeral line: tangent to lateral condyle, lies lateral to radial neck in normal elbows; may be more reliable in younger children to assess alignment.

    • Look for:

      • Subtle metaphyseal fracture lines at neck.

      • Radial head tilt / translation, rotation.

      • Posterior or anterior fat pad sign (note: partial extra-articular location of radial neck → effusion may be absent).

  • Special view:

    • Radiocapitellar (Greenspan) view: oblique lateral with beam angled 45° proximally to better visualize radial head.

  • CT:

    • Reserved for older children with comminuted intra-articular head fractures and for preoperative planning.

  • MRI:

    • Rarely needed; may help in a pre-ossified elbow or for occult compression fractures and ligamentous injury; cost vs benefit must be considered.

7. Classification

  • O’Brien classification (angulation of radial neck)

    • Type I: <30° angulation.

    • Type II: 30–60°.

    • Type III: >60°.

  • Judet classification

    • I: Undisplaced.

    • II: <30° angulation.

    • III: 30–60°.

    • IVa: 60–80°.

    • IVb: >80°.

  • Chambers classification (by primary displacement & mechanism – less used clinically).

  • Treatment algorithms and prognostic studies generally use angulation + translation + age rather than pure fracture type.

8. Treatment Principles

  • Aim: restore radiocapitellar alignment, preserve motion, avoid iatrogenic damage (especially osteonecrosis and synostosis).

  • General rules:

    • Less invasive first (closed reduction, percutaneous techniques) whenever acceptable reduction can be obtained.

    • Avoid open reduction unless absolutely necessary; strongly associated with higher rates of stiffness, osteonecrosis, and synostosis.

9. Nonoperative Management

  • Immobilization alone (no reduction)

    • Indications (commonly accepted):

      • Angulation <30°.

      • Translation <3 mm.

      • Satisfactory motion (no gross mechanical block).

      • Reliable follow-up and no significant associated injuries.

    • Technique:

      • Long arm cast or splint, elbow 90° flexion, forearm neutral or slight supination.

      • Immobilization 7–21 days, then early active ROM.

    • Outcomes:

      • Systematic review data show excellent ROM and function for fractures with post-treatment angulation ≤20–30° treated conservatively; greater angulation correlates with loss of motion.

  • Closed reduction + immobilization (no internal fixation)

    • Indications:

      • Initial angulation >30° where acceptable reduction (<30° and <3 mm translation) can be achieved by manipulation alone.

    • Maneuvers:

      • Patterson maneuver (traction, varus, direct pressure on radial head).

      • Israeli (Kaufman) technique (flexion 90°, pronation with pressure on head).

      • Neher–Torch technique (traction, varus, radial head manipulation)

      • Elastic bandage (Esmarch) method (application wrist to elbow, spontaneous reduction)

    • Key point: reassess with fluoroscopy; avoid repeated forceful manipulations that risk AVN.

10. Operative Management

  • Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPP / ESIN)

    • Indications:

      • Residual angulation >30° after closed reduction.

      • Translation >3–4 mm.

      • Pronation/supination arc <45° due to block.

    • Techniques:

      • K-wire “joystick” (push or lever technique) from proximal or distal metaphysis to correct tilt and translation; wires may be left as fixation.

      • Metaizeau technique (ESIN): retrograde flexible nail inserted from distal radius, advanced across fracture; rotation of nail used to lever head into alignment, nail left for internal fixation.

    • Evidence:

      • JPOSNA and systematic reviews emphasize CRPP/Metaizeau as preferred for significantly angulated yet reducible fractures, with good ROM and lower complication rates versus open reduction.

      • Recent series suggest faster ossification and earlier radiographic healing with Metaizeau vs K-wire fixation, though functional differences may be modest.

  • Open reduction ± internal fixation (ORIF)

    • Indications (when all closed / percutaneous methods fail):

      • Residual angulation >45°.

      • Inability to obtain or maintain satisfactory alignment with closed/percutaneous techniques.

      • Irreducible fracture, often due to interposed tissue or severe displacement/comminution.

    • Principles:

      • Lateral approach to radiocapitellar joint.

      • Pronate forearm to move PIN away from surgical field.

      • Gentle handling, minimal periosteal stripping; avoid transcapitellar pins when possible.

    • Outcomes:

      • Consistently associated with higher rates of stiffness, osteonecrosis (up to ~70% of AVN cases), synostosis, and need for revision compared with closed techniques—partly reflecting more severe fracture patterns.

11. Complications

  • Loss of motion / stiffness

    • Most common complication (reported ~10–30% in many series). Loss of pronation is more frequent than loss of supination.

  • Radial head overgrowth

    • Radiographic enlargement or irregularity in 20–40% of cases; usually no functional consequence.

  • Osteonecrosis (AVN) of radial head

    • Occurs in ~10–20% overall; majority associated with open reduction and severe displacement.

  • Physeal arrest / growth disturbance

    • May lead to cubitus valgus deformity and elbow incongruity.

  • Radioulnar synostosis

    • Serious but rare; associated with extensive dissection, delayed treatment, and open reduction with interosseous scarring.

  • PIN palsy

    • May occur after surgical manipulation or pinning; up to ~15% transient deficits reported, usually neuropraxia.

  • Malunion / chronic instability

    • Malunited intra-articular fractures can lead to radiocapitellar incongruity, chronic pain, mechanical symptoms, and degenerative change.

12. Prognostic Factors

  • Worse prognosis associated with:

    • Age >10 years.

    • Higher Judet/O’Brien grade (greater angulation/displacement).

    • Intra-articular head involvement vs extra-articular neck fractures.

    • Associated injuries (olecranon, medial epicondyle, elbow dislocation, Monteggia).

    • Need for open reduction and extensive dissection.

  • Key positive factors:

    • Successful closed or percutaneous reduction to ≤20–30° angulation and minimal translation.

    • Early motion after stable fixation, within safe window.

References

1-    Langenberg LC, van den Ende KIM, Reijman M, Boersen GJJ, Colaris JW. Pediatric Radial Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review Regarding the Influence of Fracture Treatment on Elbow Function. Children (Basel). 2022;9(7):1049. Published 2022 Jul 14. doi:10.3390/children9071049

2-    Evans MC, Graham HK. Radial neck fractures in children: a management algorithm. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1999;8(2):93-99.

3-    Tan BH, Mahadev A. Radial neck fractures in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011;19(2):209-212. doi:10.1177/230949901101900216

4-    Kalbitz M, Lackner I, Perl M, Pressmar J. Radial head and neck fractures in children and adolescents. Front Pediatr. 2023;10:988372. Published 2023 Jan 20. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.988372

5-    Meng H, Li M, Jie Q, Wu Y. Effect analysis of different methods on radial neck fracture in children. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1181. Published 2023 Jan 21. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28294-9

6-    Stöckell M, Lampio E, Sagstetter F, Sinikumpu J. Faster healing of radial neck fractures in children treated with the Metaizeau technique compared with percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation: a population-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):624. Published 2025 Jul 4. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08830-6