Figures
Epidemiology
Incidence: ~1–5 per 100,000
Age: 40–60 years
Predominantly male (≈90–95%)
More common in the dominant arm (not absolute)
Mechanism of Injury
Sudden eccentric load on a flexed elbow during forced extension.
Typical scenario:
Lifting a heavy object → tendon avulses during extension
Risk Factors
Smoking
Anabolic steroid use
High BMI
Degenerative tendon changes
Anatomy
Distal insertion: radial tuberosity
Footprint:
Short head → distal and radial
Long head → proximal and ulnar
Functional contribution:
Long head → supination
Short head → flexion
Lacertus fibrosus (bicipital aponeurosis):
Intact → limits retraction
Torn → marked proximal migration
Pathophysiology
Tendon avulsion from radial tuberosity
Often complete rupture
Proximal retraction of muscle belly
Contributing factors:
Hypovascular zone
Tendon degeneration
Mechanical impingement
Clinical Presentation
Sudden antecubital pain
Audible “pop”
Swelling and ecchymosis
Functional deficit:
Supination ↓↓
Flexion ↓
Physical Examination
Key Findings
Reverse “Popeye” deformity
Palpable tendon defect
Asymmetry
Special Tests (High-yield)
Hook Test
Inability to hook tendon → suggests complete rupture
No forearm supination → ruptureDiagnosis is often clinical
Imaging
X-ray
Usually normal
Used to exclude other pathology
MRI (Gold standard)
Partial vs complete tear
Degree of retraction
Surgical planning
Ultrasound
Dynamic and useful
Operator dependent
Classification
By Extent
Partial rupture
Complete rupture
By Timing
Acute (<3–4 weeks)
Subacute
Chronic (>8–12 weeks)
Treatment
Nonoperative Management
Indications
Low-demand patients
Partial tears
High surgical risk
Outcomes
~30–40% loss of supination strength
~20% loss of flexion strength
Possible cosmetic deformity
Operative Treatment
Indications
Complete rupture
Active patients
Functional demand
Timing
Ideal: within 2–3 weeks
Delay → retraction → more complex repair
Surgical Techniques
Approach
Single incision (anterior)
Less dissection
Higher nerve injury risk
Double incision
More anatomic footprint
Risk of heterotopic ossification
Fixation Methods
Cortical button (strongest fixation)
Suture anchors
Interference screw
Bone tunnels
Complications
Nerve injury (most common):
Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve
Posterior interosseous nerve
Heterotopic ossification (more with double incision)
Re-rupture (rare)
Stiffness
Hematoma / infection
Prognosis
Excellent with early repair
Near-normal strength recovery
Worse outcomes with:
Delayed treatment
Chronic rupture
Pits and Pearls
Hook test is the most reliable clinical test
Supination loss is more significant than flexion loss
Early surgery provides best outcomes
Lacertus fibrosus affects retraction
Pitfalls
Misdiagnosing as muscle strain
Delayed referral
Ignoring partial tears
Underestimating functional deficit
Concept Summary
Supination loss drives disability
Diagnosis is mostly clinical
Early repair is key to optimal outcome
Mini Decision Algorithm
Condition | Decision | Action |
|---|---|---|
Acute antecubital pain + "pop" | Suspect | Distal biceps rupture workup — inspect, palpate, hook test |
Hook test positive | Likely Complete rupture | Confirm clinically — proceed to MRI for retraction + planning |
MRI confirmed + active patient | Surgery | Primary repair within 2–3 weeks — single or two-incision technique |
MRI confirmed + low-demand patient | Consider conservative | Accept ~30% strength loss in supination — functional for ADLs |
Delayed presentation (>4 weeks) | Reconstruction with graft | Graft interposition — autograft or allograft; counsel on reduced outcomes |