Definition
Disruption of the triceps tendon insertion on the olecranon
Can be:
Partial
Complete
Rare but commonly misdiagnosed
Epidemiology
<1% of all tendon injuries
More common in:
Males
Athletes (weightlifting)
Mechanism of Injury
Sudden eccentric contraction of triceps
Fall on outstretched hand
Direct trauma
Risk Factors
Anabolic steroid use
Chronic renal failure
Hyperparathyroidism
Diabetes
Local steroid injections
Pathophysiology
Failure at:
Tendon insertion (most common)
Musculotendinous junction (rare)
Often associated with:
Olecranon avulsion fragment
Clinical Presentation
Posterior elbow pain
Swelling / ecchymosis
Weakness in extension
Difficulty pushing
Physical Examination
Palpable gap proximal to olecranon
Decreased extension strength
Key Test
Modified Thompson test (triceps squeeze test)
Absence of extension → rupture
Imaging
Xray
“Flake sign” (olecranon avulsion)
MRI
Gold standard
Distinguishes:
Partial vs complete rupture
Ultrasound
Useful bedside tool
Classification
Partial Rupture
Tendon continuity preserved
Complete Rupture
Full disruption of insertion
Treatment
Nonoperative Management
Indications
Partial tears
Low-demand patients
Management
Immobilisation (extension)
Gradual rehabilitation
Operative Treatment
Indications
Complete rupture
High-demand patients
Significant weakness
Surgical Techniques
Transosseous repair
Suture anchors
Goal:
Restore extensor mechanism
Postoperative Protocol
Initial immobilisation
Gradual ROM
Strengthening after healing
Complications
Re-rupture
Weak extension
Stiffness
Wound issues
Prognosis
Good outcomes with early repair
Delayed diagnosis → worse results
Pits & Pearls
Rare injury → easy to miss
Look for flake sign on X-ray
Always test active extension
Early repair = better outcome
Pitfalls
Misdiagnosing as elbow sprain
Missing partial tears
Delayed surgical referral
Inadequate rehab
Mini Decision Algorithm
Condition | Decision | Action |
|---|---|---|
Posterior elbow pain + weakness | Suspect | Triceps rupture workup — palpate gap, Thompson test |
X-ray flake sign present | High suspicion | Bony avulsion confirmed — proceed to MRI |
MRI confirms partial tear (<50%) | Conservative | Splint at 30° flexion × 4 weeks + serial imaging |
MRI confirms complete tear | Surgery | Repair within 2–3 weeks — double-row anchor |
Delayed diagnosis (>3–4 weeks) | Expect worse | Reconstruction with graft — counsel patient on reduced outcomes |
High Yield
• Complete rupture = absent active elbow extension against gravity — surgical repair mandatory |
• Partial rupture: extension maintained AND MRI confirms <50% tear → non-operative acceptable |
• Bony avulsion (most common ~75%): suture anchor repair to olecranon footprint |
• Chronic tear (>3–4 weeks): primary repair often impossible — plan reconstruction |
• Strong association with anabolic steroid use and chronic renal failure — always enquire |
• Bilateral triceps rupture: systemic cause mandatory — check renal function, PTH, calcium |
References
McKee MD et al. Open reduction and internal fixation compared with total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2009.
Elmi-Terander A et al. ORIF versus total elbow arthroplasty: Two-year outcomes in distal humerus fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2021.
Sanchez-Sotelo J et al. Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus orthogonal plating in distal humerus fractures.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007.
Jupiter JB & Mehne DK Fractures of the distal humerus.Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992.
O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2000.
Srinivasan RC et al.Ulnar nerve management in distal humerus fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2005.
Doornberg JN et al. Long-term outcomes of ORIF for distal humerus fractures.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2006.
Morrey BF et al. Functional evaluation of the elbow. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 1981.