SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMUR FRACTURES

Resident Dr. Onur UZUNTEPE· Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
Apr 28, 2026

MARY

Subtrochanteric femur fractures occur within the region extending from the lesser trochanter to approximately 5 cm distal. These fractures are characterized by high mechanical stress, strong deforming muscular forces, and a relatively high risk of fixation failure and nonunion.

Management is technically demanding and requires stable fixation and precise reduction.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

  • Accounts for ~5–10% of proximal femur fractures

  • Bimodal distribution:

    • Elderly: low-energy (osteoporotic)

    • Young: high-energy trauma

  • Associated with:

    • Pathologic fractures (metastasis)

    • Atypical fractures (bisphosphonate-related)


ETIOLOGY & MECHANISM

  • Low-energy fall (elderly)

  • High-energy trauma (young)

  • Repetitive stress → atypical fractures


PATHOANATOMY

  • Dense cortical bone → limited blood supply

  • High stress concentration (transition zone)

  • Healing slower than intertrochanteric fractures


DEFORMING FORCES (VERY HIGH-YIELD)

Proximal fragment:

  • Iliopsoas → flexion

  • Gluteus medius/minimus → abduction

  • Short external rotators → external rotation

Distal fragment:

  • Adductors → medial displacement + shortening

👉 Result:

  • Varus deformity

  • Flexion + external rotation of proximal fragment


ANATOMY

  • Thick cortical bone

  • High compressive + tensile forces

  • Reduced vascularity compared to intertrochanteric region


CLASSIFICATION

AO/OTA

  • 32-A → simple

  • 32-B → wedge

  • 32-C → complex


Atypical fractures (important subgroup)

  • Lateral cortex origin

  • Transverse pattern

  • Minimal comminution

  • Associated with bisphosphonates


PRESENTATION

  • Severe thigh/hip pain

  • Inability to bear weight

  • Deformity (shortening, rotation)


IMAGING

Radiographs:

  • AP pelvis

  • Full-length femur (critical!)

Evaluate:

  • Fracture extension

  • Comminution

  • Lateral wall

  • Bowing (IM nail planning)

CT:

  • Selected cases (complex fractures)


TREATMENT

General Principles

  • Almost always operative

  • Goals:

    • Restore alignment

    • Achieve stable fixation

    • Allow early mobilization


SURGICAL TREATMENT

1. Intramedullary Nailing (Gold Standard)

  • Long cephalomedullary nail

Advantages:

  • Load-sharing device

  • Shorter lever arm

  • Better biomechanics


2. Plate Fixation (Selected cases)

  • Indications:

    • IM nail contraindicated

    • Severe deformity

    • Periprosthetic fractures


REDUCTION PRINCIPLES (CRITICAL)

  • Correct:

    • Varus deformity

    • Flexion deformity

    • Rotation

Techniques:

  • Traction table

  • Clamp-assisted reduction

  • Open reduction if necessary


KEY SURGICAL PEARLS

  • Avoid varus → most common failure nedeni

  • Nail entry point critical

  • Restore medial cortex continuity

  • Consider blocking screws


COMPLICATIONS

Mechanical

  • Nonunion

  • Malunion (varus)

  • Implant failure

Biological

  • Delayed union

  • Infection

Specific

  • Iatrogenic fracture

  • Hardware failure


PROGNOSIS

  • Worse than intertrochanteric fractures

  • Dependent on:

    • Reduction quality

    • Stability

    • Bone quality